检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:王晓[1] 周高强[1] Wang Xiao;Zhou Gaoqiang(Shandong Electric Power Engineering Consulting Institute Co.,Ltd.,Jinan 250013,China)
机构地区:[1]山东电力工程咨询院有限公司,济南250013
出 处:《发电设备》2021年第4期263-266,共4页Power Equipment
摘 要:以典型30 MW的农林生物质发电机组为研究对象,对比常规方案和再热方案的初投资、发电收益和燃料成本,并且对再热方案在农林生物质发电机组的经济性进行分析。结果表明:与常规方案相比,再热方案初投资增加1956万元;分别从发电收益和燃料成本角度分析,再热方案初投资增加额的静态投资回收年限都在5 a左右,具有明显经济性,可为农林生物质发电机组装机方案和主机型式选择提供参考。Taking a typical 30 MW agroforestry biomass power generation unit as the research object,comparisons were conducted on initial investment,power generation income and fuel cost of conventional scheme and reheat scheme,and the economy of reheat scheme in the biomass power generation unit was analyzed.Results show that compared with conventional scheme,the initial investment with reheat scheme increases 19.56 million yuan.From the point of power generation income and fuel cost,respectively,the static pay off periods of initial investment variations with reheat scheme are both about 5 years,which presents a good economy.This may serves as a reference for installation and heat-engine type selection in agroforestry biomass power generation units.
分 类 号:TM619[电气工程—电力系统及自动化]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145