中美对“一带一路”沿线技术扩散结构比较研究  

Comparing Technology Diffusion Structure of China and the U.S.to Countries Along the Belt and Road

作　　者：高伊林 闵超[1] Gao Yilin;Min Chao(School of Information Management,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210023,China)

机构地区：[1]南京大学信息管理学院,南京210023

出　　处：《数据分析与知识发现》2021年第6期80-92,共13页Data Analysis and Knowledge Discovery

基　　金：江苏省社会科学基金项目(项目编号:18TQC005)的研究成果之一。

摘　　要：【目的】基于专利视角探索“一带一路”背景下以中、美为代表的科技大国在不同技术领域上国际技术扩散的特征与结构。【方法】基于PCT国际专利合作与跨国专利申请数据,采用QAP分析从技术、地区层面衡量专利合作、专利布局两种技术扩散渠道的协同度。【结果】我国在“一带一路”沿线专利部署初显成效,技术扩散形成较好的技术协同度;我国在技术扩散结构、程度上与美国存在一定差距。【局限】仅比较中、美两国的技术扩散特征,暂未考虑其他国家,暂未分析知识产权贸易等其他类型的技术扩散渠道特征。【结论】通过中、美技术扩散结构对比和协同性分析,为我国实施“一带一路”倡议提供参考。[Objective]This study explores the characteristics and structure of international technology diffusion in different fields by China and the United States,from the perspectives of patents and the Belt and Road Initiatives.[Methods]First,we collected needed data from PCT international patent cooperation and transnational patent applications.Then,we used social network QAP analysis to measure the synergy of the two technology diffusion channels technically and regionally.[Results]China’s patent strategy in countries along the Belt and Road has achieved some positive results,while the technology diffusion formed a high degree of synergy.However,there are some gaps between China and the United States in technology diffusion.[Limitations]The study only compared the technological diffusion of China and the United States.The characteristics of other technology diffusion channels,such as intellectual property trade,were not analyzed.[Conclusions]This study could help China more effectively implement the Belt and Road Initiative.

关 键 词：国际技术扩散 “一带一路” 专利申请 协同性 社会网络分析 

分 类 号：G306[文化科学]