检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:Van Thanh Hoang Wankun Liu Jang Min Park
机构地区:[1]School of Mechanical Engineering,Yeungnam University,Daehak-ro 280,Gyeongsan,38541,Republic of Korea [2]Department of Mechanical Engineering,The University of Danang-University of Science and Technology,Nguyen Luong Bang Street 54,Danang,Viet Nam
出 处:《Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering》2021年第4期937-944,共8页岩石力学与岩土工程学报(英文版)
基 金:financially supported by Yeungnam University Research Grant Program 2019。
摘 要:Recently,Zou et al.(2020 a)published a theoretical analysis on the radial flow of a Bingham fluid,where they argued that the classical analysis by Dai and Bird(1981)violates the mass conservation.The present discussion aims to clarify this conflict between those two studies.It is noted that Zou et al.(2020 a)presumed the gap-wise mass flux is negligible in the mass conservation equation,while Dai and Bird(1981)did not require so in their model,and this is found to be the origin of the conflict.In fact,Dai and Bird(1981)’s model is shown to not violate the mass conservation.Therefore,those two models should be viewed as separate models derived from different perspectives.Details of the major difference between the two models are discussed.
关 键 词:Rock grouting Radial flow Bingham fluid Analytical solution
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.64