检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邓高翔 DENG Gaoxiang
机构地区:[1]安徽师范大学历史与社会学院,安徽芜湖241000
出 处:《淮南师范学院学报》2021年第3期88-93,共6页Journal of Huainan Normal University
摘 要:清末徽州地区烟毒横行,吸烟者十之六七。文章以《陶甓公牍》中有关晚清社会禁烟措施的记载为研究对象,对刘汝骥采取的禁烟措施进行了分析,徽州知府刘汝骥严禁烟馆,杜绝源头;清点烟民,造册登记;颁发照牌,领照吸食;宗族自治,加强士绅官差管控。这些措施的实施使禁烟运动取得了一定程度上的成效。然而,受多重因素的制约,其最终效果不容乐观。文章在窥探刘汝骥禁烟措施利弊基础上分析总结了禁烟运动的经验教训,并探索其对当代社会治理的借鉴意义。At the end of the Qing Dynasty,tobacco toxicity was rampant in Huizhou.There were six to seven out of ten smokers.There are a lot of records on the anti-drug measures on the platform of the late Qing Dynasty.Liu Ruji,the prefectural governor of Huizhou,initiated the anti-drug campaign in Huizhou by prohibiting smoking dens,eliminating the source,counting smokers,registering,issuing license plates,obtaining license to smoke,making use of clan autonomy,sharing the promotion of villagers'sages,and strengthening the control of gentry and officials.This paper attempts to study from the perspective of Liu Ruji's anti-drug measures,pry into its advantages and disadvantages,analyze the reasons for its failure,summarize the experience and lessons in the anti-drug campaign,and explore the reference significance of contemporary social governance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.248