检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙登科 汪玮 SUN Dengke;WANG Wei(School of Humanities and Law,Jiangsu Ocean University,Lianyungang 222005,China;People’s Procuratorate of Donghai County,Lianyungang 222300,China)
机构地区:[1]江苏海洋大学文法学院,江苏连云港222005 [2]东海县人民检察院,江苏连云港222300
出 处:《江苏海洋大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2021年第4期50-62,共13页Journal of Jiangsu Ocean University(Humanities & Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目(20BFX140);江苏省第五期“333高层次人才培养工程”科研资助项目(BRA2020274)。
摘 要:在全球加快个人数据保护立法趋势的推动下,有关个人数据跨境保护的立法数量每年都有所增长,为数据主体的权利保护提供了法律保障。与此同时,由于各国的法律制度、文化传统及立法水平的差异,导致法律冲突现象严重,增加了法律适用的难度。个人数据跨境保护的法律冲突主要体现在个人数据跨境保护的法律主体冲突、客体冲突以及内容冲突三个方面。通过制定统一实体法解决个人数据跨境保护的法律冲突固然是一种理想模式,但将会面临逻辑和政策上的障碍;而利用冲突规范来解决个人数据跨境保护的法律冲突则是未来国际立法的必然选择,但仍需要处理好确定性和灵活性、形式正义和实质正义等方面问题。Driven by the global trend of speeding up legislation on personal data protection,the legislation on cross-border protection of personal data is increasing every year,providing legal protection for the rights of data subjects.At the same time,due to the differences of legal system,cultural tradition and legislative level in different countries,the phenomenon of legal conflict is serious,which increases the difficulty of law application.The legal conflicts of cross-border protection of personal data are mainly reflected in three aspects:subject conflict,object conflict and content conflict.It is an ideal model to solve the conflict of laws in the cross-border protection of personal data by formulating a unified substantive law,but it will face logical and policy obstacles;It is an inevitable choice for future international legislation to use conflict norms to solve the legal conflict of cross-border protection of personal data,but it still needs to deal with the problems of certainty and flexibility,formal justice and substantive justice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.219.92.7