检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:翟小会 Zhai Xiaohui(School of Law and Sociology,Luoyang Normal University,Luoyang 471934,China)
机构地区:[1]洛阳师范学院法学与社会学院,河南洛阳471934
出 处:《洛阳师范学院学报》2021年第8期69-73,共5页Journal of Luoyang Normal University
基 金:河南哲学社会科学规划项目(2017BZH005)。
摘 要:我国公共文化服务绩效评估理论及实践成果日渐丰富,但已有成果理论基础薄弱滞后于实践,不能充分发挥其对实践的指导作用;各地评估实践多是“摸着石头过河”,存在一定区域性和不稳定性.理论研究从“碎片化”走向“系统化”,从“单一视角和方法”走向“多维视角和方法”已成为其基本发展方向.在国家治理体系现代化和社会数字化发展背景下,未来评估实践必将走向统一化、动态化、多元化、数字化、常态化和制度化,对评估价值理性的追求和评估本身的监督也将成为未来公共文化服务绩效评估探索的重点.The theory and practice of public cultural service performance evaluation in our country has had great achievement,but the theoretical foundation of the existing achievements lags behind practice and cannot give full play to its guiding role.Without theoretical guidance,evaluations practices are mostly careful trials which are are regional and instable.Therefore,the theoretical research must develop from being‘fragmental’to‘systematic’,from being‘single in perspective and method’to‘multidimensional in perspective and method’.In the background of the modernization of the national governance system and the development of the digitalized society,evaluation practices in the future are bound to be unified,dynamic,diversified,digitized,normalized and institutionalized,the pursuit of value rationality and the supervision of evaluation itself will become the focus of public cultural service performance evaluation in the future.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.14.64.102