检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:程雪阳[1] Cheng Xueyang
出 处:《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》2021年第4期132-141,共10页Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:教育部人文社科研究基金(19YJC820007)“乡村振兴背景下集体建设用地供应体制改革研究”。
摘 要:开展跨行政区划法院改革探索对于完善我国的司法制度意义重大。从合宪性分析和制度落实的角度来看,我国现行宪法所建立的"专门人民法院"制度可以为这一项改革提供有效的制度通道,因此,《人民法院组织法》应当通过"专门人民法院"制度来落实中央所确定的改革目标,而不是径直在该部法律中增加"跨行政区划法院"这一新的法院类型。当然,目前的"专门人民法院"制度与实践并不完全符合现行宪法的规范要求,因此应当着力从合宪性角度对其进行理论反思和制度完善,并以此为基础来完善我国的专门人民法院制度。The reform of the court of across administrative divisions is an important reform to prefect of judicial system of China. While, the system of "special people’s court" within the constitution of China have provided the reasonable "system channel" for this reform, Therefore, the People’s Court Organization Law should implement the reform goals set by the central government through the system of "special people’s courts", but not to establish a new type of court which named court of across administrative divisions. However, the current system and practice of "special people’s court" is not fully implementing the Constitution of China. Therefore, we should focus on theoretical reflection and institutional improvement from the perspective of constitutional review, and thus improve the system of "special people’s court" of China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.94.214