检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:华桦[1] HUA Hua(Institute of Sociology Shanghai Academy of Social Sciences,Shanghai,200032)
机构地区:[1]上海社会科学院社会学研究所,上海200020
出 处:《清华大学教育研究》2021年第3期118-128,共11页Tsinghua Journal of Education
基 金:2018年度国家社会科学基金项目“‘高选择-低选拔’高考制度下新时代高等教育机会平等研究”(18BSH038)。
摘 要:20世纪70年代以来,伴随着大学招生的竞争加剧、学生内部异质性增强以及大学入学机会不平等的凸显,美国加强了对大学升学选择模型机制的不断探究。其中,过程模型关注升学选择的综合过程,其出发点是优化招生策略;多层模型强调多重社会背景对升学选择的制约,有助于解释升学选择和教育机会的不平等;理性行动模型重视个体选择的微观机制,回应了美国非裔学生对大学的教育热望和实际升学选择之间的悖论。三类模型分别展现了升学选择的过程系统性、背景复杂性和个体差异性,为我国高考改革背景下的升学选择研究提供了启示和借鉴。Since the 1970 s, with the intensified competition between universities in student recruitment, the increasingly diversified student body, and the prominence of unequal access to universities, the research on college choice has been strengthened continuously in the United States. Among the various theoretical models, the process model considers the college choice as a comprehensive process, aiming at optimizing the recruitment strategy. The multi-layered conceptual model focuses on the restriction of multiple social backgrounds on college choice, contributing to understanding the inequality in college access. The rational action model emphasizes the micro-mechanisms of individual choice and responds to the paradox between college aspirations and choice among African-American students. Demonstrating the process of systematicness, background complexity, and individual differences in college choice, the three models provide enlightenment and references for college choice studies under the college entrance examination reform in China.
分 类 号:G647.32[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.238