检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:YANG Lun YANG Jianhui JIAO Wenjun LIU Moucheng LI Wenhua 杨伦;杨建辉;焦雯珺;刘某承;李文华(中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所,北京100100;山东农业大学经济管理学院,山东泰安271018;中国科学院大学,北京100049)
机构地区:[1]Institute of Geographic Sciences and Natural Resources Research,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100101,China [2]School of Economics and Management,Shandong Agricultural University,Taian,Shandong 271018,China [3]University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China
出 处:《Journal of Resources and Ecology》2021年第4期480-488,共9页资源与生态学报(英文版)
基 金:The National Natural Science Foundation of China (42001249)。
摘 要:Based on the basic selection criteria of Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems(GIAHS)and food and livelihood security research trends,this paper established an evaluation framework and indicator system for food and livelihood security in GIAHS and selected the first GIAHS site in the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau as a case for empirical evaluation.The results demonstrate that the food and livelihood security of farmers at this site was at a medium level,with an average evaluation value of 2.91,which still lagged behind the level of better food and livelihood security.Specifically,the average values of farmers’evaluation of food security and livelihood security were 1.43 and 1.48,respectively,which show that farmers’food security in the study area was at a medium level and that of livelihood security was relatively good.Simultaneously,the more simple a farmers’economic activities(i.e.,agriculture-oriented economic activities or non-agriculture-oriented economic activities),the worse their food and livelihood security;while the more diversified the economic activities(i.e.,engaged in part-time economic activities),the better the food and livelihood security.本文基于全球重要农业文化遗产(GIAHS)的基本遴选标准和粮食与生计安全的研究动态,尝试性地构建了适用于GIAHS的粮食与生计安全评估框架与指标体系,并选取位于青藏高原地区的迭部扎尕那农林牧复合系统为案例进行了实证评估。就整体评估结果而言,该系统内农户的粮食与生计安全状况处于中等水平,评估值为2.91,距离较好的粮食与生计安全状况仍有差距。其中,农户的粮食安全状况处于中等水平,评估值为1.43,但核心食物产品安全普遍较差;农户的生计安全状况则相对较好,评估值为1.48,但生计资本安全状况普遍较差。同时,农户从事的经济活动越单一,其粮食与生计安全状况越差;经济活动越多元,其粮食与生计安全状况越好。然而,核心食物产品和生计资本分别是该系统的"关键要素"和农户维持生计的重要基础。因此,为保障和提升该系统内农户的粮食与生计安全,应当以重点改善农户的核心食物产品安全和生计资本安全为目标和突破口。
关 键 词:Globally Important Agricultural Heritage Systems(GIAHS) food security livelihood security concept framework evaluation indicator Biebu Zhagana Agriculture-Forestry-Animal Husbandry Composite System
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.32