检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:尚苗苗 王丽媛[1] 崔新[1] 李媛媛[1] 杨丽娟[2] SHANG Miaomiao;WANG Liyuan;CUI Xin;LI Yuanyuan;YANG Lijuan(Shandong Provincial Hospital affiliated to Shandong University,No.324,Jingwu Road,Ji'nan,Shandong Province,250021,PRC)
机构地区:[1]山东大学附属省立医院,250021 [2]山东大学附属省立医院护理部,250021
出 处:《中国医院》2021年第8期33-36,共4页Chinese Hospitals
基 金:山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2015GM007)。
摘 要:目的:基于卓越绩效评价准则,构建ICU护理质量评价指标体系。方法:运用文献分析以及专题小组讨论法初步构建指标框架,通过两轮专家咨询确立ICU护理质量评价指标体系。结果:专家咨询的权威系数为0.83,判断系数为0.94,熟悉系数为0.72。最终构建的ICU护理质量评价指标体系涵盖6项一级指标、30项二级指标和91项三级指标;一、二、三级指标的协调系数分别为0.152、0.193、0.171。结论:经检验,ICU护理质量评价指标体系科学可靠,可为ICU护理质量的客观评价提供依据。Objective:To develop an indicator system based on outstanding performance evaluation criteria to evaluate nursing quality in ICU.Methods:According to the literature review and experts’discussion,the first manuscript was constructed.Delphi technique was used to formulate the indicators through a two-round expert consultation among 23 experts.The weight of indicator was calculated by variation coefficient method.Results:The experts’authority coefficient was 0.83,coefficient of determination was 0.94,and familiar coefficient was 0.72.The quality indicators consisted of 6 first-level indicators,30 second-level indicators and 91 third-level indicators.The coordination coefficients of the three-level indicators were 0.707,0.356,and 0.342 respectively.Conclusion:The indicator system to evaluate nursing quality in ICU was scientific and reliable.It can be used to provide an objective reference for the evaluation of nursing quality in ICU.
关 键 词:重症监护病房 护理质量 质量指标 德尔菲法 卓越绩效
分 类 号:R197.3[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117