美国“印太战略”为何不涉及非洲——“去非洲化”及其动因与影响  

Why Does the U.S.Indo-Pacific Strategy Not Involve Africa:“De-Africanization”and Its Causes and Influences

作　　者：赵晨光[1,2] Zhao Chenguang

机构地区：[1]外交学院周恩来外交研究中心 [2]外交学院非洲研究中心

出　　处：《美国研究》2021年第3期46-59,6,共15页The Chinese Journal of American Studies

基　　金：北京市社科基金项目“中非合作论坛峰会的机制化问题研究”(项目编号:18ZGC014)的阶段性成果;国家社科基金“一带一路”建设研究专项“未来3~5年共建‘一带一路’面临的机遇、风险和挑战研究”(项目编号:19VDL003)的阶段性成果。

摘　　要：美国"印太战略"不涉及(环印度洋)非洲,而日本、印度甚至澳大利亚等地区大国却将非洲视作"印太"的一部分。可见,"非洲定位"是"印太"概念存在张力的体现之一。事实上,美国"印太"概念的建构经历了"去非洲化"的过程。特别是特朗普政府意图通过将极具标志性意义的非洲排除在外,凸显"印太"的战略属性、安全属性以及封闭的"联盟"属性,从而构建符合美国战略利益的"印太"范式,掌握地区战略的主导权。美国"印太战略"的"去非洲化"很大程度上超越了印太地区得以形成的客观现实基础或限度,因此其进一步实施也面临着无可避免的困境。The"Indo-Pacific strategy"of the United States does not involve Eastern Africa(around the Indian Ocean),while regional powers such as Japan,India and even Australia regard Africa as a part of the Indo-Pacific region.It can be seen that"African orientation"is one of the manifestations of the tension in the concept of"Indo-Pacific".In fact,the construction of the U.S."Indo-Pacific"concept has gone through the process of"De-Africanization".In particular,the Trump Administration intended to highlight the strategic,security,and closed"alliance"attributes of"Indo-Pacific"by excluding Africa,which is of great symbolic significance,to build an"Indo-Pacific"paradigm in line with the strategic interests of the United States and to grasp the dominant power of regional strategy.The"De-Africanization"of the U.S."Indo-Pacific strategy"goes beyond the objective and realistic basis or limit of the formation of the Indo-Pacific region,so its further implementation is facing inevitable difficulties.

关 键 词：美国军事与外交 “印太战略” 去非洲化 亚非增长走廊 “印太” 四国同盟 

分 类 号：D871.2[政治法律—政治学]