检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘祖强[1,2] 陈炜灿 毛冬旭 薛建阳 LIU Zu-qiang;CHEN Wei-can;MAO Dong-xu;XUE Jian-yang(School of Civil Engineering,Xi’an University of Architecture&Technology,Xi’an,Shaanxi 710055,China;Key Lab of Structural Engineering and Earthquake Resistance,Ministry of Education(XAUAT),Xi’an,Shaanxi 710055,China;Shaanxi Institute of Architecture Science,Xi’an,Shaanxi 710082,China)
机构地区:[1]西安建筑科技大学土木工程学院,陕西西安710055 [2]西安建筑科技大学结构工程与抗震教育部重点实验室,陕西西安710055 [3]陕西省建筑科学研究院有限公司,陕西西安710082
出 处:《工程力学》2021年第7期120-132,158,共14页Engineering Mechanics
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(51308444);陕西省创新人才推进计划项目(2019TD-029,2019KJXX-018);陕西省留学人员科技活动择优资助项目(2019021);陕西省建筑科学研究院科研课题项目(2020-11-329)。
摘 要:为研究型钢混凝土异形柱框架的空间受力性能,对一个五层的双向两跨空间框架模型进行了低周反复加载试验,得到了空间框架的破坏形态及滞回曲线和骨架曲线,分析了其延性、位移角、刚度、耗能等抗震性能指标。基于此,采用OpenSees建立了空间框架的有限元模型,计算结果与试验结果吻合较好,进而对空间框架的破坏机制和协同工作机制进行了探讨,并分析了不同加载角下轴压比和柱肢长宽比对空间框架受力性能的影响。研究结果表明:型钢混凝土异形柱空间框架的梁端先于柱端发生破坏,节点损伤相对轻微,边框架的破坏程度比中框架严重;出铰顺序呈现为从梁端到柱端、从低层到高层、从中榀到边榀的发展规律;空间框架的滞回曲线基本对称且较为饱满,具有较好的延性及较强的耗能能力和抗倒塌能力,受力性能优于没有连接的独立框架;随着加载角的增大,空间框架的承载能力和耗能能力显著提高,初始刚度略微增大,延性先变好后变差;在相同加载角下,随着轴压比增大,空间框架的承载能力、延性和耗能能力均降低,初始刚度先增大后减小;随着柱肢长宽比增大,空间框架的承载能力、初始刚度和耗能能力均提高,延性变差。To study the spatial mechanical performance of steel reinforced concrete frames with special-shaped columns,a five-story two-direction two-span spatial frame model was tested under low cyclic reversed loading.The failure modes,hysteretic curves and skeleton curves were obtained.The seismic performance indexes such as the ductility,story drift ratio,stiffness,and energy dissipation were analyzed.Based on the experimental study,a finite element model of the spatial frame was established by using OpenSees.The analysis results agreed well with the experimental results.The failure mechanism and the cooperative work mechanism were investigated.The influence of the axial compression ratio and column limb length-width ratio under different loading angles were analyzed.The results show that the beam ends failed earlier than the column ends,and the joints were less damaged.The damage of the edge frame was more serious than that of the middle frame.The plastic hinges of the spatial frame developed from the beam ends to the column ends,from the bottom to the top,and from the middle frame to the edge frame.The hysteretic curves were symmetric and full.The ductility was good.The energy dissipation capacity and the collapse resistance were large.The mechanical performance of the spatial frame was better than that of independent frames without connection.With the increment of loading angle,the strength and energy dissipation capacity were obviously increased,the initial stiffness was slightly increased,and the ductility was first increased and then decreased.With the same loading angel and increment of the axial compression ratio,the strength,ductility and energy dissipation capacity of the spatial frame were decreased,and the initial stiffness was first increased and then decreased.With the same loading angel and increment of the column limb length-width ratio,the strength,initial stiffness and energy dissipation capacity of the spatial frame were increased.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.51