检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谭鑫 黄泽媛 杨军利[2] 郭豫桐 张凡 Tan Xin;Huang Zeyuan;Yang Junli;Guo Yutong;Zhang Fan(School of Aeronautical Engineering,Civil Aviation Flight University of China,Guanghan Sichuan 618307,China;不详)
机构地区:[1]中国民用航空飞行学院航空工程学院,四川广汉618307 [2]中国民用航空飞行学院飞行技术学院,四川广汉618307
出 处:《航天医学与医学工程》2021年第3期229-236,共8页Space Medicine & Medical Engineering
基 金:民航局安全能力建设资金(DFS20190403);中国民用航空飞行学院研究生创新项目(X2020-12);大学生创新创业训练计划(S201910624060)。
摘 要:目的研究一种面向飞行员需求的电子飞行包(EFB)可用性评估模型。方法首先对79名飞行员和11名专家开展可用性调查,通过德尔菲法、文献研究和现场调研结果,构建了由标准、一致性、工作负荷、可记忆性、效率和错误6项一级指标和22项二级指标的层次指标体系;其次提出一种基于AHP-CRITIC法的模糊综合评价模型,既保留了专家的主观意见又利用了飞行员的客观原始数据;最后通过组合赋权法得到各指标的综合权重值,并解算现有EFB和新版本EFB的评价结果,探究EFB的使用情况。结果通过对比不同群体以及不同EFB版本的评价结果,最终得出建议改进的优先级为:错误>一致性>工作负荷>标准>效率>可记忆性。结论基于AHP-CRITIC法的模糊综合评价模型具有可行性和有效性,可为后续的再设计和优化提供依据。Objective To study a usability evaluation model for electronic flight bag(EFB)of pilots.Methods First,the usability was investigated in 79 pilots from 10 airlines and 11 experts in different fields.Through Delphi method,literature research and field survey results,a hierarchical index system consisting of six first-class indicators including standard,consistency,workload,memorability,efficiency and error and 22 second-class indicators was constructed.Second,a fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model based on AHP-CRITIC method was proposed.The experts’main role was retained,and at the same time,the objective raw data of pilots were used in the observation.The comprehensive weight value of each index was obtained by combination weighting method,and the evaluation results of existing EFB and new version EFB were calculated to explore the usability of EFB.Results By comparing the evaluation results of three questionnaires from different groups and different EFB versions,the priority of improvement was:error>consistency>workload>standard>efficiency>memorability.Conclusion The fuzzy comprehensive evaluation model based on AHP-CRITIC method is feasible and effective,and can provide the basis for subsequent redesign and optimization.
关 键 词:电子飞行包 可用性 层次分析法 CRITIC法 模糊综合评价
分 类 号:V243.6[航空宇航科学与技术—飞行器设计]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38