论明清《史记》评点与小说评点的互济为用  

Mutual Aid for Use of Comments on The Historical Records and Novels in Ming and Qing Dynasties

作　　者：刘彦青[1] Liu Yanqing

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学文学院

出　　处：《励耘学刊》2021年第1期171-190,400,共21页

基　　金：国家社科基金重大招标项目“中外《史记》文学研究资料整理与研究”,项目编号:13&ZD111;第65批中国博士后科学基金面上资助“评点与《史记》文学经典的建构”,资助编号:2019M653540;陕西省社科基金一般项目“抄本时期《史记》‘本纪’文本生成研究”,项目编号:2019J024。

摘　　要：明清小说评点萌兴于繁盛的《史记》评点背景下,其产生之初不得不借鉴此时期较为成熟的《史记》评点。以李贽为标志,文人逐渐参与到小说评点之中,拟《史记》评点成为小说评点的风潮。以吴见思《史记论文》为标志,《史记》评点开始借鉴小说评点,形成《史记》评点与小说评点互济为用的面貌。这一方面进一步提升了小说的文体地位与艺术水准,另一方面深化了《史记》的文本解读内容,进一步推进了其经典化传播与接受。在科举背景下,《史记》评点与小说评点的互济为用助力推动了士人们对文法的学习与对中国传统文章学理论的建构。The commentary of novels in the Ming and Qing Dynasties came into being under the background of the commentary of The Historical Records,at the beginning of its production,it had to use for reference the more mature commentary of The Historical Records.With Li Zhi as the symbol,the literati gradually took part in the commentary of the novel,imitating the commentary of The Historical Records to become the trend of the commentary of the novel.Then,marked by Wu Jian-si's Essays on the Historical Records,the commentaries on The Historical Records began to draw lessons from the commentaries on novels,forming the feature of mutual use of the commentaries on The Historical Records and the commentaries on novels.On the one hand,it further promotes the literary status and artistic standard of the novel,on the other hand,it deepens the textual interpretation of The Historical Records,and further promotes its classical dissemination and acceptance.Under the background of imperial examination,the mutual aid between the commentary of The Historical Records and the commentary of novels helped the scholars to study grammar and to construct the theory of traditional Chinese literary theory.

关 键 词：史记 小说评点 文章学 

分 类 号：I207.41[文学—中国文学] I207.5[历史地理—历史学] K248[历史地理—中国史]