机构地区:[1]湖南农业大学资源环境学院,农田污染控制与农业资源利用湖南省重点实验室,植物营养湖南省普通高等学校重点实验室,土壤肥料资源高效利用国家工程实验室,长沙410128
出 处:《农业环境科学学报》2021年第7期1529-1537,共9页Journal of Agro-Environment Science
基 金:国家重点研发计划项目(2018YFD0800500);湖南省重点领域研究发展计划项目(2019NK2021)。
摘 要:研究洞庭湖双季稻区不同种植方式下,稻田氨挥发量变化、田面水氮磷浓度动态特征以及不同土壤深度养分含量差异,可为水稻机械化精准施肥,防控面源污染提供理论依据。研究采用田间试验方法,设置农民习惯+直播(T1)、控释尿素减氮10%+直播(T2)和机插一次性施肥减氮10%(T3)3个处理,原位监测早稻基肥期稻田氨挥发,取样监测施肥后田面水总氮、总磷及不同形态氮磷浓度,收获期计产,并取0~20 cm和20~40 cm土壤测定其基本理化性状。结果表明,与T1相比,T3和T2田面水NH_(4)^(+)-N平均浓度分别降低46.04%和27.03%,氨挥发量分别降低18.62%和15.61%;田面水总氮平均浓度分别降低53.55%和22.96%,总磷浓度分别降低30.23%和11.63%;T3和T2均可显著增加稻田0~20 cm和20~40 cm土壤中有机碳含量,提高全氮、全磷、碱解氮和有效磷含量,水稻产量分别增加6.63%和5.98%。与T1相比,T3和T2两种施肥种植方式均能显著降低稻田氨挥发以及稻田田面水总氮、总磷浓度,能有效增加0~20 cm和20~40 cm土壤有机碳、全氮、全磷、碱解氮和速效磷含量。在3种种植方式中,T3在降低农田氮、磷流失风险、维持土壤肥力、促进水稻增产方面效果更显著。The main objective of this study is to investigate the effects of different planting patterns on ammonia volatilization of rice fields,dynamic change in N and P concentrations of field water,and the nutrient content at different soil depths.This study aimes to provide a theoretical basis for the technical application and promotion of precision mechanized one-time fertilization and non-point source pollution prevention in the Dongting Lake double-cropping rice area.Three treatments,including farmer habit+direct seeding(T1),controlledrelease urea to reduce N by 10%+direct seeding(T2),and machine transplanting one-time fertilization to reduce N by 10%(T3)were studied based on the field test method.The experiment monitored the ammonia volatilizes of the base fertilizer period and detected the content of different N and P forms in the field surface water after fertilization.Additionally,soil physicochemical properties at depths of 0~20 cm and 20~40 cm were measured and the total yield was analyzed.The NH_(4)^(+)-N concentration,ammonia volatilization amount,and total N and total P content of field water in the T3 treatment were decreased by 46.04%,18.62%,53.55%,and 30.23%,respectively,compared to the T1 treatment.These variables in the T2 treatment were decreased by 27.03%,15.61%,22.96%,and 11.63%,respectively,compared to the T1 treatment.The T2 and T3 treatments significantly increased the content of organic carbon,total N,total P,alkali hydrolyzable N,and available P in 0~20 cm and 20~40 cm soils compared to the T1 treatment and increased rice yield by 6.63%and 5.98%,respectively.The two management practices(T2 and T3)effectively decreased the ammonia volatilization in rice fields,and total N and total P content of rice field water,and increased the content of organic carbon,soil total N,total P,alkali hydrolyzable N,and available P in the 0~20 cm and 20~40 cm soils compared to the T1 treatment.The advantages of the T3 treatment for reducing N are prominent,shown by its better ability to reduce N and P losses and im
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...