检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏旭煦 关曼柯 石兆峰 尤良震 蒋寅 赵晨 商洪才[1,3] WEI Xuxu;GUAN Manke;SHI Zhaofeng;YOU Liangzhen;JIANG Yin;ZHAO Chen;SHANG Hongcai(Dongzhimen Hospital,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100700,P.R.China;Institute of Basic Research in Clinical Medicine,China Academy of Chinese Medical Sciences,Beijing 100700,P.R.China;International Evidence-Based Chinese Medicine Institute,Beijing University of Chinese Medicine,Beijing 100029,P.R.China)
机构地区:[1]北京中医药大学东直门医院,北京100700 [2]中国中医科学院中医临床基础医学研究所,北京100700 [3]北京中医药大学国际循证中医药研究院,北京100029
出 处:《中国循证医学杂志》2021年第7期858-862,共5页Chinese Journal of Evidence-based Medicine
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(编号:81725024、81803963)。
摘 要:在循证实践的路径中,证据的个体适用性评价依赖于临床医生的主观判断,缺少系统的方法学指导。而中医临床信息的复杂性增加了依靠主观判断证据适用性的不确定性和风险。本文分析循证临床实践流程,对中医药证据适用性评价的方法学进行了探索和尝试,提出通过建立基于临床试验原始数据的疗效预测模型来评价证据的个体适用性,以促进中医药证据的合理应用。In the process of evidence-based practice,the evaluation of evidence applicability relied on the subjective judgment of clinicians,while the systematic method of which was still in lack.The complex clinical information of traditional Chinese medicine(TCM)enhanced the uncertainty and risk of applying evidence.Based on the analysis of the process of evidence-based practice,this paper introduced the method of TCM evidence applicability evaluation and used the raw data of clinical trials to develop a clinical prediction model to enable the assessment of the evidence applicability on individual patients.The establishment of individual evidence applicability evaluation method could promote the rational application of TCM evidence in the long term.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.118.32.116