检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:姚山春 YAO Shan-chun(School of Criminal Law,East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China)
出 处:《唐山学院学报》2021年第4期46-52,共7页Journal of Tangshan University
摘 要:近年来,利用“短信嗅探”技术进行网络侵财的案件频频发生,相较于传统的网络侵财案件,此类案件在行为上更具隐秘性和技术性。然而,考察该类案件的技术原理和行为模式,不难发现,该类犯罪行为定性的内核仍然是信用卡诈骗罪和盗窃罪的界分。在定性时,应当先明确“嗅探”盗刷行为的对象是信用卡账户还是第三方支付平台账户,如果为信用卡,应定性为信用卡诈骗罪;如果是第三方支付平台账户,应定性为盗窃罪。In recent years,there have been so many cases where“SMS sniffing”technology are used for property infringement on the Internet.Compared with the similar traditional cases,they are more secretive and technical in behavior.However,by examining their technical principles and behavioral patterns,it is not difficult to find that the qualitative core of such crimes is still the distinction between credit card fraud and theft.When they are classified,it should be clear whether the“sniffed”object is a credit card account or a third-party payment platform account.Correspondingly,it should be classified as a credit card fraud when the object is the former one and a theft for the latter one.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7