明代任职辽东官员杂考二则  

Two Textual Researches on the Officials in Liaodong in Ming Dynasty

作　　者：苏卫国[1] SU Weiguo(School of Humanities and Communication,Anshan Normal University,Anshan Liaoning 114007,China)

机构地区：[1]鞍山师范学院人文与传播学院,辽宁鞍山114007

出　　处：《鞍山师范学院学报》2021年第3期15-20,共6页Journal of Anshan Normal University

摘　　要：存世明代辽东史料十分丰富,晚近以来史家对相关资料汇辑整理成果也层出不穷。从任职官吏资料来讲,由于人员众多,迁转错综,现有成果难免有误。通过史料排比可知,史载王锴实有多人,其中两人履历比较明确,一为成化间武职,一为正德时文臣。“分守道”一职虽在各史志中记载较为全面,但依然可以判定有漏载之可能,如高田、王三接等。发现相关疑点有助于我们更全面地认识某个职官及其在辽东所发挥的作用。以上两例说明,利用现有成果,细心梳理排比,甄别错误,查阙补漏,澄清认识,很有必要。The historical materials of Liaodong in Ming Dynasty are very rich,so there are a lot of academic achievements in meticulously organizing the historical materials.Many of them are the collation of official information in Liaodong.However,due to the huge amount of historical data,it is inevitable that there will be some minor mistakes in the works.According to historical data,there were two definite identities of the official named Wang Kai in the Ming Dynasty.One became a military officer and the other a civil official in different governance periods.The officials who served as the“Fen Shou Dao”basically got accurate records in local records,but we still could find unrecorded cases,such as Gao Tian,Wang Sanjie and so on.The analysis of these differences in the records will help us to have a more comprehensive understanding of the function of this office.The above two examples show that timely correction of the existing errors and improvement of the existing academic research results will be quite necessary.

关 键 词：明朝 辽东 人物 考证 

分 类 号：K29[历史地理—历史学]