检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:从宇乾 陈玉梅[1] CONG Yuqian;CHEN Yumei(School of Law,GuiZhou University of Finance and Economics,Gui Yang 550025,China)
出 处:《城市学刊》2021年第4期45-50,共6页Journal of Urban Studies
基 金:贵州省研究生科研基金立项课题(黔教合YJSCXJH﹝2019﹞067)。
摘 要:“合村并居”作为解决土地矛盾的重要尝试却在实践中饱受质疑,这主要是由于地方政府推动“合村并居”时的主观目的与客观行为存在异化。对二者进行矫正,回归“合村并居”保障农民利益的根本目的,在保障资金安全的前提下,做到规划先行、尊重农民意愿、切实后续保障,是地方政府推动“合村并居”的最佳路径。As an important attempt to solve the contradiction of land,"living together in combined villages"has been questioned in practice.This is mainly due to the alienation of the subjective purpose and objective behavior of the local government when it promotes the"living together in combined villages".It is the best way for local government to promote"living together in combined villages"by rectifying the purpose and behavior,returning to the fundamental purpose to protect the interests of farmers,and achieving current planning,respecting the farmers’wishes and practical follow-up protection on the premise of ensuring the safety of funds.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.23.128.245