3种交叉配血方法在输血检验中的应用评价  

Evaluation of the Clinical Application of Three Cross-matching Methods in Blood Transfusion Testing

作　　者：吴文雁 WU Wenyan(Fujian Provincial Peopie's Hospital,Fuzhou 350004,China)

机构地区：[1]福建省人民医院,福建福州350004

出　　处：《中国医药指南》2021年第17期106-107,共2页Guide of China Medicine

摘　　要：目的探讨凝聚胺法、微柱凝胶法和盐水法交叉配血在临床输血中的应用效果。方法对2018年11月至2020年7月在我院进行输血的165例患者分别通过凝聚胺法、微柱凝胶法以及盐水法进行交叉配血试验,同时对3种方法的灵敏度、准确度和稳定性进行分析。结果凝聚胺法和微柱凝胶法的灵敏度、准确度和稳定性均明显高于盐水法,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论凝聚胺法与微柱凝胶法较盐水法更适合在临床输血中使用。3种方法各有优缺点,根据实际情况灵活选择合适的方法进行交叉配血,可以最大程度保障用血安全。Objective To compare the application effect of the polybrene method,the microcolumn gel method and the brine method in clinical crossmatching.Methods Cross-matching tests were performed by the coagulamine method,the microcolumn gel method and the saline method in 165 patients who underwent blood transfusion in our hospital from November 2018 to July 2020,the sensitivity,accuracy and stability of these methods were were analyzed.Results The sensitivity,accuracy and stability of the coagulant amine method and the microcolumn gel method were significantly higher than those of the saline method,the difference was statistically significant(P<0.05).Conclusion Compared to brine method,polybrene method and microcolumn gel are suitable for promoting their use in clinical blood transfusion.Each method has its advantages and disadvantages,by choosing the appropriate method for cross-matching according to the actual situation,the safety of blood use can be maximised.

关 键 词：凝聚胺法 微柱凝胶法 盐水法 交叉配血 

分 类 号：R457.1[医药卫生—治疗学]