检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:占善刚[1] 陈哲 ZHAN Shan-gang;CHEN Zhe(School of Law,Wuhan University,Wuhan 430072,China)
出 处:《湖南大学学报(社会科学版)》2021年第4期129-134,共6页Journal of Hunan University(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金一般项目:审判程序违法的类型化处理研究(17BFX053)。
摘 要:从认识论出发可知,我国民事诉讼存有审判公开未完全落实、诚信原则拘束力不够,以及法官在审判时仍独断裁判等诸多问题。而上述问题的解决若仅仅通过修法和出台司法解释予以解决实难奏事半功倍之效。以商谈理论为基础构建的商谈式民事诉讼确立了主体间、合作论辩及共识事实的改革基调,构筑了交往理性为基础并遵循商谈原则的规范化沟通平台,指明了我国民事诉讼转型的方向。具体而言,以法官和当事人组成的诉讼主体间要能在公开的沟通场域之中寻求具有融贯性的案件裁判。From the perspective of epistemology,there are many problems in our civil litigation such as the failure to fully implement the open trial,the insufficient binding force of the principle of good faith,and the judge's arbitrary judgment at trial.However,if the above problems are solved only through the revision of laws and the introduction of judicial interpretation,it is difficult to achieve twice the result with half the effort.Based on the theory of negotiation,civil litigation mode of negotiation establishes the reform keynote of inter subject,cooperation debate and consensus facts,and constructs a standardized communication platform based on communicative rationality and follows the principle of negotiation,and points out the direction for the transformation of civil litigation in China.Specifically speaking,the inter subject of litigation composed of judges and parties should seek a coherent case judgment in the open communication field.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.21.125.194