检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙道乾 SUN Daoqian(School of Civil Engineering and Communication,North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power,Zhengzhou Henan 450045)
机构地区:[1]华北水利水电大学土木与交通学院,河南郑州450045
出 处:《河南科技》2021年第10期86-88,共3页Henan Science and Technology
摘 要:本文通过对某钢结构进行减震加固分析,讨论了基于防屈曲钢板剪力墙和黏滞阻尼器两种减震方案在多遇、罕遇地震影响下的性能对比。在多遇地震下,两方案的层间位移角相比原结构都有所减小;在罕遇地震情况下,两种布置方案都有效耗散了地震能量,提高了结构的安全性。对比发现,黏滞阻尼器滞回曲线更加饱满,消耗地震能量较多,两方案布置均满足规范要求。Based on the analysis of a steel structure,this paper discussed the performance comparison of two damping schemed based on buckling restrained steel plate shear wall and viscous damper under the influence of frequent and rare earthquakes.In the case of frequent earthquakes,the story drift angle of the two schemes was smaller than that of the original structure;In case of rare earthquake,the two layout schemes could effectively dissipate the seismic energy and improve the safety of the structure.It was found that the hysteretic curve of viscous damper was fuller and consumes more seismic energy.Both schemes met the requirements of the code.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145