检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡斌[1] 李广之 HU Bin;LI Guang-Zhi(Wuxi Institute of Petroleum Geology,Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Production,Sinopec,Wuxi 214126,China)
机构地区:[1]中国石油化工股份有限公司石油勘探开发研究院无锡石油地质研究所,江苏无锡214126
出 处:《物探与化探》2021年第4期1043-1047,共5页Geophysical and Geochemical Exploration
基 金:国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFC0604902);中国石化科技部项目(P20041-2)联合资助。
摘 要:油气化探分析测试质量的监控与评估在现行各标准规范中规定不够详尽,质量要求上也存在一定的差异。本文通过对现行有效的国家标准、行业标准和企业标准相关内容的比较并结合多年质量管理经验,对油气化探分析测试工作中常用的监控和评估方法进行了系统的分析和评价。同时,在对比研究各标准对允许误差和合格率规定的基础上,指出了其他标准在质量规定上低于国家标准,需要及时对其进行制修订,并呼吁加快研制油气化探标准样,保证量值准确溯源,促进和提升油气化探分析测试质量监控水平。The quality monitoring and evaluation of oil and gas geochemical analysis and testing are not detailed enough in the current standards and specifications,and there are also some differences in quality requirements.Based on a comparison of related contents of the effective national standards,industry standards and enterprise standards and combined with many years of experience in quality management,this paper systematically analyzes and evaluates the monitoring and evaluation methods commonly used in oil and gas geochemical analysis and testing.At the same time,based on the comparative study of the allowable error and the qualified rate of each standard,it is pointed out that the other standards are lower than the national standards in quality and need to be revised in time.This paper also calls for speeding up the development of standard samples for oil and gas geochemical exploration,ensuring the accurate tracing of quantitative values,and promoting and improving the quality monitoring level of oil and gas geochemical analysis and testing.
分 类 号:P632[天文地球—地质矿产勘探]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249