检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏巍[1,2] 孙屹博 杨光[1,2] 孙杨 杨鑫华[1,2] WEI Wei;SUN Yibo;YANG Guang;SUN Yang;YANG Xinhua(Materials Science Institute of Dalian Jiaotong University,Dalian 116028,China;Liaoning Key Laboratory of Welding and Reliability of Rail Transportation Equipment,Dalian 116028,China)
机构地区:[1]大连交通大学,大连116028 [2]辽宁省轨道交通装备焊接与可靠性重点实验室,大连116028
出 处:《焊接学报》2021年第4期49-55,I0003,共8页Transactions of The China Welding Institution
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51875072);轨道交通装备焊接智能制造与可靠性研究(2018LNGXGJWPY-YB012).
摘 要:传统基于温度数据的疲劳强度预测方法,无法揭示疲劳过程背后的不可逆能量耗散机理.针对Q460焊接接头疲劳强度,提出一种新的基于不同载荷等级下能量耗散斜率转折的疲劳强度预测方法,即最大斜率法.采用红外热像仪测得的试件表面实时热像数据,建立高周疲劳过程能量耗散模型,并计算不同载荷等级下的Q460焊接接头能量耗散值.借助不同载荷等级下的能量耗散随载荷等级增加时其值存在转折点这一理论,将能量耗散作为疲劳强度的预测参量,实现其疲劳强度的快速预测.为验证模型的准确性,将由最大斜率法得出的疲劳强度估计值分别与传统双线法和升降法的计算值进行对比.结果表明,由最大斜率法得到的疲劳强度预测值与通过双线法和升降法得到的预测值较为接近,误差分别为0.04%和7.40%,能够为焊接接头疲劳强度预测提供一定的参考.Traditional temperature-based fatigue strength prediction method,fail to reveal the irreversible energy dissipation behind the fatigue evolution.For the fatigue strength evaluation of Q460 welded joints,a new fatigue strength prediction method,which is based on the energy dissipation of different load levels that exists the turning point,was proposed,i.e.maximum slope method.The energy dissipation was firstly established based on the obtained realtime thermographic data of the specimen surface,and then the energy dissipation value of Q460 welded joints were calculated.Based on the theory of the energy dissipation turning point exists when the load level increases,the energy dissipation was set as an index for rapid fatigue strength estimation.To verify the accuracy of the developed model,the fatigue strength value estimated by the maximum slope method was compared with the predicted value by the traditional bilinear and staircase methods.The results show that a good agreement is reached between the predicted fatigue strength by the maximum slope method and the traditional bi-linear and staircase methods,and the errors are 0.04% and 4.76%,respectively,which may provide a certain reference for fatigue strength prediction of welded joints.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31