检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张君 ZHANG Jun(Dalian Public Health Clinical Center(Dalian Sixth People's Hospital),Dalian 116033,China)
机构地区:[1]大连市公共卫生临床中心(大连市第六人民医院),辽宁大连116033
出 处:《中国医药指南》2021年第19期218-219,共2页Guide of China Medicine
摘 要:目的探讨个性化护理模式对基层维持性血透患者营养状况的临床影响。方法以本院为单位,于2018年2月至2019年2月选取基层MHD患者70例,将其依据随机数字表法分成两组,对照组35例开展传统护理,观察组35例实施个性化护理干预,对比两组干预前及干预3个月时的改良主观营养评分(MQSGA)、营养不良-炎症评分(MIS)。结果两组干预前MQSGA、MIS评分比较,均无明显差异(P> 0.05);干预3个月后,两组MQSGA、MIS评分较治疗前均有明显降低,且观察组较对照组更低(P <0.05)。结论针对基层MHD患者采用个性化护理干预,能改善其营养状况,临床应用价值突出。Objective To explore the clinical impact of personalized nursing model on nutritional status of primary maintenance hemodialysis(MHD)patients.Methods In our hospital,in February 2018-February 2019,selection of grassroots MHD patients 70 cases,it is divided into two groups according to random number table method,the control group 35 cases to carry out the traditional nursing care,observation group of 35 cases of the implementation of personalized nursing intervention,compared the two groups before intervention and subjective nutritional intervention for 3 months at the time of the improved score(MQSGA),malnutrition-inflammation score(MIS).Results There was no significant difference in the scores of MQSGA and MIS between the two groups before intervention(P>05).After 3 months of intervention,the scores of MQSGA and MIS in both groups were significantly lower than those before treatment(P<0.05),while the lower scores were more significant in the observation group(P<0.05).Conclusion Individualized nursing intervention for primary MHD patients can improve their nutritional status and have outstanding clinical application value.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15