三种不同腹腔镜手术器械灭菌方法的效果的比较  

Comparison of the efficacy of three different disinfection methods for laparoscopic surgical instruments

作　　者：王海艳 陈叶丹 Wang Haiyan;Chen Yedan(The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical College,570102)

机构地区：[1]海南医学院第一附属医院手术室,570102

出　　处：《现代科学仪器》2021年第4期85-87,107,共4页Modern Scientific Instruments

摘　　要：目的:探讨环氧乙烷、过氧化氢等离子、戊二醛三种不同的灭菌方法对腹腔镜手术器械灭菌效果的影响。方法:将287件腹腔镜手术器械分为A、B、C三组,A组96件,采用环氧乙烷进行消毒;B组96件,采用过氧化氢低温等离子灭菌法进行灭菌;C组95件,采用戊二醛进行消毒灭菌。结果:3种灭菌方法生物检测合格率均为100%,与其他两种方法相比,过氧化氢等离子低温灭菌的灭菌时间最少、灭菌后有效时间最长、没有毒性反应。结论:三种方法中,在没有经济压力、需要快速周转腹腔镜手术器械的情况下优先选择过氧化氢等离子低温灭菌技术。Objective:To investigate the effects of three different cleaning methods of ethylene oxide,hydrogen peroxide and glutaraldehyde on the disinfection of laparoscopic surgical instruments.Methods:287 laparoscopic surgical instruments were divided into three groups:group A(n=96)were sterilized with ethylene oxide,group B(n=96)were sterilized with hydrogen peroxide low temperature plasma sterilization,and group C(n=95)were sterilized with glutaraldehyde.Results:The qualified rate of biological detection of the three sterilization methods is 100%.Compared with the other two methods,hydrogen peroxide plasma low temperature sterilization has the least sterilization time,the longest effective time after sterilization and no toxic reaction.Conclusion:In the absence of economic pressure and the need for rapid turnover of laparoscopic surgical instruments,hydrogen peroxide plasma hypothermic sterilization is preferred.

关 键 词：戊二醛 过氧化氢 环氧乙烷 腹腔镜 灭菌 

分 类 号：R18[医药卫生—流行病学]