民法典时代版权引诱侵权规范体系构造  

The Legal Structure of Induced Copyright Infringement in the Era of Civil Code

作　　者：夏朝羡 Xia Zhaoxian(Intellectual Property School,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 200000,China)

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学知识产权学院,上海200000

出　　处：《科技与法律（中英文）》2021年第4期73-80,共8页Science Technology and Law（Chinese-English Version）

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目“媒体融合中的版权理论与运用研究”(19ZDA330)。

摘　　要：民法典时代,诸多法律规范尤其是侵权法规则需要修正甚至重构,理论研究和实践探索也遇到新的挑战。《著作权法》乃至整个知识产权法律体系中并未明确引入间接侵权的相关规则,而版权引诱侵权本身更非立法用语,但相关司法实践并没有止步,以至规则指向教唆、帮助侵权并将教唆、帮助两者混同,甚至出现跳过版权引诱侵权直接认定侵权的情况。对此,可以对比美国相关制度的建立和运用,构建我国版权引诱侵权规范体系,即厘清版权引诱侵权规范要素,对版权引诱侵权予以定型化,重点突出故意意图,给予实质性非侵权用途的适用例外,区分引诱与帮助侵权,把版权引诱侵权从共同侵权中剥离出来,明确按份责任的法效果。In the era of Civil Code,laws and regulations,especially tort rules,need to be coordinated or even recon⁃structed,theoretical research and practical exploration have also encountered new challenges.Although the copyright law and even the entire intellectual property legal system do not explicitly introduce relevant rules for indirect infringe⁃ment,and induced copyright infringement itself is not a legislative term,the relevant judicial practice has not stopped.The rules of assisting and abetting infringement are applied but confuse the assisting and abetting behaviors,some⁃times even skip induced copyright infringement to determine infringement directly.In comparison to the practice in the United States,it is vital to establish China's rules about induced copyright infringement.That is,to clarify the norms of induced copyright infringement,to standardize induced copyright infringement,to highlight intentional intent and give exception to the rule of substantive non-infringing uses,and to distinguish inducing and assisting infringement while separate induced copyright infringement from joint infringement and clarify the legal effect of share liability.

关 键 词：版权 引诱侵权 间接侵权 

分 类 号：D923[政治法律—民商法学]