检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:征咪 Zheng Mi
出 处:《史学月刊》2021年第7期92-100,共9页Journal of Historical Science
摘 要:作为一种高效捕鱼的技术手段,拖网因其破坏性的工作方式,在英国历史上长期受到渔民群体的抵制和政府的警惕。19世纪中期之后,英国政府在经济效益的刺激之下,建立调查委员会对渔业状况展开调查,“科学决策”取代了渔民的经验传统,政府对拖网的态度因此从限制转向鼓励,从而为工业化捕鱼的无节制掠夺开启了大门。从英国海洋拖网渔业立法基调的调整过程中可以看到,在处理人与自然的相关议题时,将当下科学研究成果视为唯一可靠的决策依据,缺乏对自然的敬畏和对传统经验的尊重,将会造成难以挽回的灾难性后果。As an efficient fishing technique,trawling has long been resisted by fishermen and watched over by the government throughout British history because of its destructive working methods.After the mid-nineteenth century,the British government established commissions to investigate the state of the fishing industry.Scientific decision-making replaced the empirical traditions,and government attitudes toward trawling thus shifted from restriction to encouragement.The adjustment of the tone of the British marine trawl legislation shows that when dealing with issues related to nature,taking the results of current scientific research as the only reliable basis for decision making will lead to disastrous consequences.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.90