检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:卢婧[1,2] LU Jing
机构地区:[1]中山大学 [2]南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室(珠海)
出 处:《国际法学刊》2021年第2期90-107,156,157,共20页Journal of International Law
摘 要:近期发生的美海军P-8A型反潜巡逻机于公海对中方舰艇编队进行抵近侦察的事件表明美中两国对有关海上军事侦察活动的国际法解读是不一致的。美方认为这样的海上军事侦察活动属于"公海自由",否认他国对海上军事侦察活动采取反措施同样也是行使"公海自由"的一种方式,从国际法的角度看这属于双重标准。中方从"利益平衡"的角度认识海洋法对"公海自由"的限制,认为从事海上军事侦察活动的国家不能滥用"公海自由"损害他国利益。这一解读既符合法理,也有助于减少因行使"公海自由"引发的冲突。Recently,a U.S.navy P-8 A plane carrying out reconnaissance activities against the Chinese Fleet has been lased by a Chinese destroyer,and both sides claimed that their activities are lawful under international law.The U.S.believes that reconnaissance activities fall under the freedom of the high seas,while denying that countermeasures taken by other countries against such activities can also be regarded as the freedom of the high seas.Thus this way of interpreting international law essentially reflects a double-standard.China recognizes the restraint of the freedom of the high seas from the perspective of the balance of interests,arguing against abuse of the freedom of the high seas injuring interests of other states due to reconnaissance activities.Such interpretation is legally reasonable and conducive to the reduction of conflicts caused by exercising the freedom of the high seas.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.167.79