水声材料小样品声学性能不同测试方法比较  

Comparison of Different Testing Methods for Acoustic Properties of Small Samples of Underwater Acoustic Materials

作　　者：樊宁波[1] 任伟伟[1] 乔冬平[1] FAN Ningbo;REN Weiwei;QIAO Dongping(Luoyang Ship Material Research Institute,Luoyang 471023,China)

机构地区：[1]中国船舶重工集团公司第七二五研究所,河南洛阳471023

出　　处：《材料开发与应用》2021年第3期25-29,共5页Development and Application of Materials

摘　　要：介绍了水声材料声学性能的3种不同的测试方法,通过对同种样品的性能测试,分析了不同测试方法的优缺点.结果表明,与行波法相比,脉冲法和驻波法测试可靠性较高.Three different testing methods for acoustic properties of underwater acoustic materials were presented.Through the performance test and analysis of the same kinds of samples,the advantages and disadvantages of different test methods were compared.The results showed that compared with traveling wave method,pulse method and standing wave method were more reliable in testing.

关 键 词：脉冲法 驻波法 行波法 

分 类 号：TB53[理学—物理]