比较媒介体制研究:历史、现状与未来  

Comparative Media Systems Research: History, the Status quo and Future

作　　者：方振武 韦路[2,3] FANG Zhenwu;WEI Lu(School of Journalism and Communication,Nanchang University;College of Media and International Culture,Zhejiang University)

机构地区：[1]南昌大学新闻与传播学院 [2]浙江大学传媒与国际文化学院 [3]浙江大学融媒体研究中心

出　　处：《国际新闻界》2021年第6期130-146,共17页Chinese Journal of Journalism & Communication

基　　金：国家社科基金重大项目“媒介体制与社会信任研究”(项目编号:19ZDA325)资助。

摘　　要：自1956年出版的《传媒的四种理论》开创媒介体制研究以来,学界围绕媒介体制研究已经实现了从规范研究传统向比较研究传统的转向,目前则正由定性的比较向定量的比较过渡,最近也有学者(Mihelj&Huxtable,2018)希望实现媒介体制研究的文化转向。尽管如此,当下比较媒介体制研究仍存在分析框架有待改善、概念的量化操作的效度仍待提升,独立的媒介体制数据库也亟需建设三个问题。然而,如何实现研究方法上的多元化、认识论上的情境主义(contextualism)转向和中国学术话语的参与,将是未来的比较媒介体制研究所需面临的更大挑战。Since 1956 when Four Theories of the Press was published, research on media systems has shifted from normative studies to comparative studies.Now the research paradigm is going through a transition from qualitative comparison to quantitative comparison and recently some scholars(Mihelj & Huxtable, 2018) even try to carry out a cultural turn of media system research.Nevertheless, there are three problems to be solved: 1) the analytical framework needs to be improved;2) the validity of conceptualization has to be enhanced;and 3) an independent database of media systems is waiting to be built.However, studies on comparative media system will face bigger challenges in the future such as how to make research methods diversified, how to turn to epistemological contextualism and how Chinese academia participate in it.

关 键 词：媒介体制 比较研究 媒介规范理论 比较媒介体制 

分 类 号：G206[文化科学—传播学]