“捕诉合一”办案模式下有效辩护的实践困境及其化解  

On Practical Dilemma and Solution of Effective Defense under the Mode of “Combination of Arrest and Prosecution”

作　　者：王乐男 Wang Lenan

机构地区：[1]北京理工大学法学院,北京102488

出　　处：《行政与法》2021年第7期99-109,共11页Administration and Law

摘　　要："捕诉合一"办案模式改变了原有的刑事诉讼格局,导致辩护律师在审查起诉阶段的辩护空间被大大压缩,但审查逮捕阶段的辩护无法填补审查起诉阶段的辩护功效减损,且检警一体化与检察机关专业化分工也对律师的专业素养提出了更高的要求。为了实现真正意义上的"有效辩护",有必要调整检察官考评机制,前移律师阅卷权,增加审查逮捕时对律师的告知义务,延长审查逮捕时间,并对审查逮捕进行诉讼化改造。律师则要改变工作方式,高度重视捕前辩护工作,敢于提出无罪辩护,不断强化自身素质培养,努力让所有的辩护都通往正义。The reform of "integration of arrest and prosecution" has changed the original pattern of criminal proceedings,resulting in the defense space of defense lawyers in the stage of review and prosecution being greatly compressed.However,the defense in the stage of review and arrest can not fill in the impairment of defense effectiveness in the stage of review and prosecution.Moreover,the integration of prosecution and police and the specialization of procuratorial organs also put forward higher requirements for the professionalism of lawyers.In order to realize the real sense of "effective defense",it is necessary to adjust the evaluation mechanism of prosecutors,move forward the right of lawyers to review papers,increase the obligation to inform lawyers when examining arrest,extend the time of examining arrest,and reform the procedure of examining arrest.Lawyers should change their working methods,attach great importance to the defense work before arrest,dare to put forward the defense of innocence,constantly strengthen their own quality training,and strive to make all defense lead to justice.

关 键 词：“捕诉合一” “捕诉分离” “有效辩护” 检警一体化 

分 类 号：D926.3[政治法律—法学]