检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李新月 青秀玲[2,3] 韩露 欧阳峥峥[5] LI Xinyue;QING Xiuling;HAN Lu;OUYANG Zhengzheng(School of Information Management,Nanjing University,163 Xianlin Avenue,Qixia District,Nanjing 210023,China;National Science Library,Chinese Academy of Sciences,33 Beisihuan Xilu,Zhongguancun,Haidian District,Beijing 100190,China;Department of Library Information and Archives Management,School of Economics and Management,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,33 Beisihuan Xilu,Zhongguancun,Haidian District,Beijing 100190,China;Data Management Research Center,Library of Beijing Institute of Technology,5 Zhongguancun South Street,Haidian District,Beijing 100081,China;Chengdu Library and Information Center,Chinese Academy of Sciences,16 South Section 2,Yihuan Road,Chengdu 610041,China)
机构地区:[1]南京大学信息管理学院,210023 [2]中国科学院文献情报中心,100190 [3]中国科学院大学经济管理学院图书情报与档案管理系,100190 [4]北京理工大学图书馆数据管理研究中心,100081 [5]中国科学院成都文献情报中心,610041
出 处:《中国科技期刊研究》2021年第7期935-943,共9页Chinese Journal of Scientific and Technical Periodicals
基 金:中国科学院“西部青年学者”项目“面向区域科技创新的产学研服务网络建设与服务模式研究”(Y8C0111001)
摘 要:【目的】系统梳理数据出版模式及政策发展现状,发现问题并提出建议,为生命科学领域的数据出版实践提供参考。【方法】将数据出版划分为数据仓储、数据期刊、数据与论文联合出版三种模式,调研各数据仓储、期刊官网及平台,探究不同出版模式的关键要素与特征,以及其对应的数据出版政策,提出生命科学领域数据出版实践中存在的问题及建议。【结果】数据仓储的出版模式较为普遍,但其建设完备性与质量控制性低、服务方式单一;国内生命科学领域的数据期刊比较缺乏;数据政策涵盖要素较全面,但仍需完善数据出版激励机制、存储标准等要素。【结论】数据期刊应当注重数据仓储规范,加大数据管理力度;设立本领域数据期刊,提升期刊认可度与影响力;重视学者共享数据的激励机制建设和权益保护,明确数据存储、质量控制等政策,促进融合多形态学术成果的数据出版发展。[Purposes]This paper reviews the current status of data publishing modes and relevant policies,identifies problems,and makes recommendations for future data publishing in the field of life science.[Methods]We first classified the current practices of data publishing into three modes of data warehousing publishing,data journal publishing,and data-paper co-publishing,and then investigated related data warehousing and official websites and platforms of journals to explore the key elements,characteristics,and policies of each mode.On this basis,we summarized the problems in data publishing practices in life science and proposed suggestions.[Findings]Despite the dominant position in data publishing,data warehousing publishing sees incomplete warehouses,poor quality control,and limited available service modes.There is a lack of data journals in the field of life science in China.An incentive mechanism and a unified data storage standard should be added to the current data publishing policies.[Conclusions]In the future,we should standardize data warehousing,strengthen data management,establish data journals in life science,improve journal recognition and impact,emphasize the incentive mechanism for data sharing and the protection of rights and interests,and detail the policies for data storage and quality control,so as to promote the development of data publishing which displays academic outcomes in multiple forms.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.210.133