GATT1994安全例外条款适用的内在限制——以中美DS544案为例  

The Inherent Limitations on the Application of the Security Exception Clause in GATT1994:Taking the US DS544 Case as an Example

作　　者：周忠学 周艳云 Zhou Zhongxue;Zhou Yanyun

机构地区：[1]常州大学史良法学院

出　　处：《常州大学学报（社会科学版）》2021年第4期17-29,共13页Journal of Changzhou University:Social Science Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“WTO争端解决中的中国现象与中国问题研究”(14AFX027);常州大学科技项目“美国对华‘232措施’的WTO违规性及中国应对研究”(ZMF20020079);司法部法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目“美国基于国家安全的贸易限制措施的违法性析证及中国因应策略研究”(20SFB4067)。

摘　　要：在中国诉美国钢铝产品特定措施案(DS544)中,美国适用GATT1994第二十一条安全例外条款是否合法和正当的问题成为双方争议的焦点。WTO成员方适用GATT1994安全例外条款是否符合条款内含的应然限制是判别此适用行为是否合法和正当的关键。各成员方对GATT1994安全例外条款的限制性适用基准尚存分歧与争议,GATT1994安全例外条款适用的应然限制的廓清成为WTO争端解决机构和国际经济法学界亟待解决的问题。In the specific measures of steel and aluminum products case(DS544),China v.United States,the issue of whether the application of the Security Exception Clause by the United States is legitimate and justified has become the focus of the dispute between the two sides.Whether the application of the Security Exception Clause in GATT1994 by WTO member states conforms to the limitations contained in the clause is the key to judging whether the application is legitimate and justified.There are still differences and disputes among member states on the standard of restrictive application of the Security Exception Clause in GATT1994.The clarification of the limitations on the application of the Security Exception Clause in GATT1994 has become an urgent issue to be solved by the WTO dispute settlement body and the international economic jurisprudential circle.

关 键 词：安全例外条款 适用限制 美国“232措施” 

分 类 号：DF96[政治法律—国际法学]