检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:何舟 HE Zhou(Economic Law School,East China University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201101,China)
出 处:《太原学院学报(社会科学版)》2021年第4期41-51,共11页Journal of Taiyuan University(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:作为一种新型共谋的形式,定价算法共谋的隐蔽性、稳定性等特征让传统反垄断法陷入了规制困境。如何认定垄断协议的存在以及如何确定责任主体是现行传统法律体系面临的两大困境。为在鼓励技术革新的同时保护市场竞争秩序,应当考虑以监管的谦抑性作为宗旨,拓展市场支配制度以适用于算法共谋,同时完善整个规制体系以及责任制度,事前事后都对算法共谋进行有效规制。Pricing algorithm collusion,a new form of collusion,featured by concealment and stability,set the traditional antitrust law into a regulatory dilemma.To identify the existent monopoly agreement and determine the subject of responsibility are two major difficulties faced by traditional legal system enforced currently.In order to encourage technological innovation and protect the order of market competition,we should take the modesty of supervision into consideration,expand the market domination system to apply to algorithmic collusion,improve the whole regulatory system and responsibility system,and effectively regulate algorithmic collusion before and after an event.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7