检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:柳天宇 吴丽池 LIU Tian-yu;WU Li-chi(School of Politics and Public Administration,Xinjang University,Urumqi Xinjiang 830047,China)
机构地区:[1]新疆大学政治与公共管理学院,新疆乌鲁木齐830047
出 处:《江南社会学院学报》2021年第2期69-73,80,共6页Journal of Jiangnan Social University
基 金:新疆智库课题“国际极端势力在中南亚发展态势及其对新疆的影响研究”(项目编号:XJZK2017YW008)的阶段性成果。
摘 要:“普尔瓦马事件”是印巴克什米尔问题的一个延伸。从观众成本理论的视角来看,“普尔瓦马事件”后,印度国内观众呈现出“鹰派”偏好。莫迪政府为了回应国内观众,宣称此次事件与巴官方存在联系,扬言惩治巴基斯坦,并做出越境打击的武力威胁。在巴方做出不退让的回应后,莫迪政府放弃交战,却未曾触发观众被欺骗而产生的惩罚成本。尽管莫迪政府在此次事件中成功规避了观众成本,但近年来印度国内印度教民族主义不断攀升,印度面对此类危机时所拥有的政策灵活性越来越低,南亚安全局势将更加脆弱。In fact,the“Pulwama incident”is still an extension of the Kashmir issue between India and Pakistan.From the perspective of audience cost theory,the Indian domestic audience showed a“hawkish”preference after the“Pulwama incident”.In response to the domestic audience,Modi’s government claimed there was a link between the incident and the Pakistani authorities,threatening to punish Pakistan and to use force to strike across the border.After Pakistan made a firm response,Modi’s government gave up the war without triggering the audience cost.Despite the success of Modi’s government in avoiding audience costs,Hindu nationalism has been rising in India in recent years.India will have less and less policy flexibility in the face of such crises and the security situation in South Asia will become more fragile.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.117.9.230