检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:魏凌煦 傅文奇 Wei Lingxu;Fu Wenqi
机构地区:[1]福建师范大学社会历史学院图书馆 [2]福建师范大学社会历史学院
出 处:《国家图书馆学刊》2021年第4期23-38,共16页Journal of The National Library of China
基 金:教育部人文社科基金项目“基于信息生态链的学术电子书产业链信息协同机制研究”(项目编号:18YJC870021)研究成果之一。
摘 要:综合利用网络调查法与文献调查法等方法,对美国高校图书馆电子书优先政策的内容与实践经验进行调查和分析,并归纳这些政策在内容、效力、政策细节等方面的异同。研究发现,美国高校图书馆的电子书优先政策可划分为专门型、学科型、发展型和分散型,四种类型各具特点和优势。研究可为我国高校图书馆电子书资源建设不合理、馆藏建设缺乏规划的现状提供借鉴,亦可为国内“双一流”高校图书馆制定电子书优先政策提供参考。The paper comprehensively use network investigation methods and literature investigation methods to investigate and analyze the content and practical experience of the e-preferred monograph policy of American academic libraries and summarize the similarities and differences of these policies in terms of content effective-ness and policy details.The study finds that the e-preferred monograph policy of American academic libraries can be divided into specialized disciplinary comprehensive and decentralized.The four types have their own characteristics and advantages.The study puts forward several enlightenments which can be used to provide references for the unreasonable construction of e-book resources in academic libraries in China and the lack of planning for collection construction and can also provide reference for"Double-First Class"university libraries to formulate the e-preferred monograph policy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.7