检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:向子权 杨家其[1] 李慧琳 梁学恒 XIANG Ziquan;YANG Jiaqi;LI Huilin;LIANG Xueheng(School of Transportation,Wuhan University of Technology,Wuhan 430063,China)
出 处:《华中科技大学学报(自然科学版)》2021年第8期81-85,共5页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Natural Science Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(51279153);工信部高技术船舶科研项目(工信部联装[2018]35号);中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助项目(215202003)。
摘 要:针对标准灰狼优化算法(GWO)只适合求解连续优化问题,无法直接求解离散域上的资源分配问题,提出一种基于马太效应的离散灰狼优化算法(DGWO)来求解资源分配问题.首先,根据数学映射思想给出一种将连续空间转化为离散空间、实数变换为整数的编码转换方法;然后,对其中的不可行解采用基于马太效应的修复与优化方法处理;最后,将DGWO计算结果与遗传算法结果进行对比发现不论是收敛速度,还是求解质量,DGWO算法均优于遗传算法.实验结果表明了DGWO算法求解资源分配问题的可行性、正确性和优越性.As the original grey wolf optimizer(GWO) can only solve continuous optimization problems,but cannot directly solve the resource allocation problem in the discrete domain, a discrete grey wolf optimizer(DGWO) based on the Matthew effect was proposed to solve the resource allocation problem. Firstly, according to the mathematical mapping idea, a coding conversion method was given,which converted continuous search space into discrete search space and real numbers into integers.Then,the infeasible solution was treated by repairing and optimizing method based on Matthew effect.Finally,the results of DGWO were compared with those of genetic algorithm,and it can be seen that no matter the convergence speed or the solution quality,DGWO is superior to the genetic algorithm. The experimental results show the feasibility, correctness and superiority of DGWO for the resource allocation problem solving.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.12.111.193