检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖薇 霍伟伟[2] 严登峰 XIAO Wei;HUO Wei-wei;YAN Deng-feng(Department of Human Resource Management,Shanghai Normal University,Shanghai 200234,China;SHUUTS SILC Business School,Shanghai University,Shanghai 201804,China;Business Department,New York University Shanghai,Shanghai 200122,China)
机构地区:[1]上海师范大学人力资源管理系,上海200234 [2]上海大学悉尼工商学院,上海201804 [3]上海纽约大学商学部,上海200122
出 处:《科学学研究》2021年第8期1517-1527,共11页Studies in Science of Science
基 金:国家哲学社会科学青年基金(18CGL005)。
摘 要:为了发挥众包创新模式的协同效应,创客们常常被允许、鼓励关注和借鉴彼此创意或想法,但现有文献对于众包创意的示范作用,尤其他人创意示例是否以及如何影响众包创意构思乃至生成并没有给出较为一致的回答。本研究通过公共交通服务公益广告设计创意众包任务,以众包平台创客成员为被试,采用示例创意征集和众包创意生成两阶段准实验方法,聚焦创意质量、数量、语义范畴,系统探究他人创意示例对众包创意生成的影响,以窥探众包模式下的创新协作过程"黑箱"。结果发现:(1)与没有创意示例相比,独创性创意示例可以显著提升生成创意的独创性,但会降低创意生成的流畅性,即导致生成创意数量的减少;(2)比较而言,普通创意示例对生成创意的质量和数量均没有显著影响;(3)通过潜在语义分析发现,与创新组相比,普通组的生成创意与示例创意之间的语义一致性程度更高;进一步生成创意对示例创意的语义遵从效应具有即时性,会随着时间推移逐渐消失。以上结论对众包创新模式、创新协作机制研究以及众包过程设计均具有启发和指导意义。Crowdsourcing in an increasingly important approach to pursuing innovation.In order to exert the synergy effect of crowdsourcing innovation mode,creators are often encouraged to pay attention to and learn from each other’s ideas.In crowdsourcing ideation websites,crowd members are often exposed to some stimulus ideas,such as examples provided by companies or peers’ideas.However,the existing literature does not give a more consistent answer to the exemplary effect of crowdsourcing ideas,especially whether and how idea examples from others affect crowdsourcing idea formulation and then generation.Understanding the effect of being exposed to the original stimulus ideas in the crowd-based innovation context may inform the design of the crowdsourcing process.To test this effect,an experiment was conducted where crowd-makers were invited to participate in the idea crowdsourcing task situation of public transport service advertising design based on the ZBJ.com crowdsourcing platform.In this experiment,90 experimental subjects were divided into three groups(the original group,the common group and the control group)through respectively providing each of the three groups of crowdsourcing subjects with an original idea,or a common idea,or no idea.Crowdsourced idea generation under three conditions was compared:idea generation with no idea exposure,with exposure to a common idea,and with exposure to an original idea.By comparing the originality,fluency and semantic consistency with example idea of generated ideas between the above three groups,this paper explores the influence of idea examples from others on the quality and quantity of generated ideas.The results show that the original examples can significantly improve the creativity of the generated ideas but will lead to the reduction of the number of idea generated as compared to absence of idea examples.By contrast,exposure to a common idea example has no significant impact on the quality and quantity of idea generation.Through potential semantic analysis,it is foun
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.222.110.185