检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:秦周权 Qin Zhouquan(School of Administrative Law,Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
出 处:《河北环境工程学院学报》2021年第4期15-20,36,共7页Journal of Hebei University of Environmental Engineering
基 金:2020年西南政法大学行政法学院学生科研创新项目;西南政法大学成渝地区双城经济圈发展研究院2021年度专项课题资助成果。
摘 要:通常认为,环境诉权包括环境私益诉权、环境公益诉权和环境生态诉权,实则,在我国现行法律规范框架下,环境诉权只应当表达为环境公益诉权,即环境诉权仅存在于环境公益诉讼制度内,环保公益组织和检察机关是我国法定的环境诉权主体。围绕环境诉权主体原告资格、环境诉权主体的生态恢复责任诉讼请求作出新的设置和调整,能更好发挥环境公益诉讼制度在推进环境治理法治化中的制度作用,是更好保障公众环境权益的可行性进路。It is generally believed that environmental litigation rights include environmental private interest litigation rights,environmental public interest litigation rights and environmental ecological litigation rights.In fact,under the current legal framework of China,environmental litigation rights should only be expressed as environmental public interest litigation rights,that is,environmental litigation rights only exist in the environmental public interest litigation system,environmental protection public welfare organizations and procuratorial organs are my China’s statutory environmental litigation subjects.Making new settings and adjustments around the qualifications of the plaintiff of the environmental litigation subject and the ecological restoration responsibility litigation request of the environmental litigation subject can give full play to the role of the environmental public interest litigation system in advancing the legalization of environmental governance and and is a feasible way to better protect public environmental rights and interests.
分 类 号:D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28