检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高志明[1] 乔栗方 Gao Zhiming;Qiao Lifang(Yanshan University,Qinhuangdao Hebei 066004,China)
出 处:《辽宁公安司法管理干部学院学报》2021年第4期85-96,共12页Journal of Liaoning Administrators College of Police and Justice
摘 要:在民事诉讼证据流程环节操作实践中,传统的线下法院与互联网法院在涉及电子数据类证据的取证保全、举证、质证、认证与存证环节中存有局域技术性壁垒并非孤例。区块链技术原理在比特币等多节点可溯源领域的系统应用中实现了全贴合,而在以“功能-非相似性”的法院电子数据诉前保全为靶向、法院取证联盟链构建中却呈现出框架贴合但整体疏离的样态。尤其在撼动保全概念、生成端原始数据上链的证据关联可信性、弱去中心化、哈希碰撞、底层技术存储非分布等层构问题上,平台搭建初始及后续维护中都面临底层区块链技术与表层应用场景不匹配的“伪应用”困局。In the practice of the evidence process of civil litigation,there are local technical barriers in the collection,offering,examination,certification and storage of electronic data-related evidence in the traditional offline courts and Internet courts.The principle of blockchain technology has been fully integrated in the system application in the field of multi-node traceability such as Bitcoin,however,it presents the frame fit but the overall alienation in the target of pre-litigation preservation of“function-non-similarity”electronic data and the construction of forensic alliance chain in the court.Especially in terms of the layer structure issues such as shaking the concept of preservation,the credibility of the evidence association of the original data on the generating end,weak decentralization,hash collision and non-distribution of the underlying technology storage,the initial building and subsequent maintenance of the platform face the“pseudo-application”dilemma that the bottom blockchain technology does not match the surface application scenario.
分 类 号:D918[政治法律—法学] TP311.13[自动化与计算机技术—计算机软件与理论]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49