检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴静[1] 郝楠[1] 李宁[2] 张昊[1] Wu Jing;Hao Nan;Li Ning;Zhang Hao(Department of Surgical Oncology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an Shaanxi,710061;Department of Oncology,The First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University,Xi'an Shaanxi,710061)
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学第一附属医院肿瘤外科,陕西西安710061 [2]西安交通大学第一附属医院肿瘤内科,陕西西安710061
出 处:《护士进修杂志》2021年第17期1546-1551,共6页Journal of Nurses Training
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(编号:81502442)。
摘 要:目的汉化Sheffield护理评估与转诊简表,并评价其在我国恶性肿瘤患者中的信度和效度。方法对Sheffield护理评估与转诊简表进行汉化及调试,在572例恶性肿瘤患者中进行问卷调查,并以中文版姑息关怀中的问题与需求问卷为校标,对汉化版量表进行信、效度分析。结果(1)中文版Sheffield护理评估与转诊简表共6个维度,37个项目。(2)项目分析:各项目高分组和低分组得分比较,差异均具有统计学意义(t=3.576~8.293,均P<0.05);各项目得分与总分的相关系数为0.579~0.741,量表各个项目间的相关系数为0.362~0.705(均P<0.05)。(3)效度:量表总内容效度指数为0.955;结构效度中,探索性因子分析共提取6个公因子,方差累计贡献率为79.273%,验证性因子分析显示模型结构拟合良好;校标效度中,量表总得分与中文版姑息关怀中的问题与需求问卷呈正相关(r=0.791,P<0.01)。(4)信度:总量表的Cronbach′sα系数为0.862,折半信度为0.806,重测信度为0.856。结论汉化后的Sheffield护理评估与转诊简表具有良好的信度、效度和临床实用价值,能够作为评价我国恶性肿瘤患者安宁疗护转介需求的调查工具。Objective To translate the Sheffield profile for assessment and referral for care and evaluate the reliability and validity of Chinese version in patients with malignant tumor.Methods The Chinese version of Sheffield profile for assessment and referral for care was used to investigate 572 patients with malignant tumor,and the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the scale was analyzed by using the Chinese version of problems and needs in palliative care questionnaire.Results The Chinese version of the Sheffield profile for assessment and referral for care has 6 dimensions and 37 entries.The scores of high and low groups in each item were compared,and the differences were statistically significant(t=3.576~8.293,all P<0.05).The correlation coefficient between the score of each item and the total score was 0.579~0.741,and that between each item of the scale was 0.362~0.705(all P<0.05).The total content validity index of the scale was 0.955.6 common factors were extracted by exploratory factor analysis,and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 79.273%.Confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fitted well.The total score of the scale was positively correlated with the Chinese version of problems and needs in palliative care questionnaire(r=0.791,P<0.01).Cronbachαcoefficient of the total scale is 0.862,the reliability of the half fold is 0.806,and the reliability of the retarder is 0.856.Conclusion The Sheffield profile for assessment and referral for care has good reliability,validity and clinical practical value,and can be used as an investigation tool to evaluate the referral needs of Chinese malignant tumor patients for palliative care.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.64