《刑法》第九十条之法条关系辨析  

Discrimination on the Rule Relationship about Article 90 of the Criminal Law

作　　者：桂亚胜[1] Gui Ya-sheng(Shanghai University of International Business and Economics,Shanghai,China,201620)

机构地区：[1]上海对外经贸大学法学院,上海201620

出　　处：《湖南警察学院学报》2021年第3期20-25,共6页Journal of Hunan Police Academy

摘　　要：《刑法》第九十条赋予自治区、省人民代表大会变通刑法的权力。刑法变通权不属于自治立法的范畴,其权力来源于全国人大的法条授权。《刑法》第九十条不是《宪法》第一百一十五条、第一百一十六条及《民族区域自治法》第十九条的具体化,也并不与《立法法》第八条、第九条相抵触。《刑法》第九十条不是《刑法》第六条第一款属地原则的例外。确定变通刑法的适用范围,需要同时符合属地原则和属人原则的要求。Article 90 of the Criminal Law grants the autonomous regions and provincial people’s congress the power to accommodate the criminal law.The power of criminal law accommodation does not belong to the category of autonomous legislation,but derives from the authorization of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress.Article 90 of the Criminal Law is not the embodiment of the Article 115 and 116 of the Constitution Law or Article 19 of Regional Ethnic Autonomy Law,nor does contradict the Articles 8 and 9 of the Legislation law.Article 90 of the Criminal Law is not an exception to the principle of territoriality on the Article 6.1 of the Criminal Law.To affirm the applicable scope of the criminal law accommodation,it is necessary to meet the requirements of the principle of territoriality and the principle of manhood.

关 键 词：变通刑法 法条关系 法律性质 法律效力 

分 类 号：D924.1[政治法律—刑法学]