优化“一带一路”国际科技合作项目评审专家人数的探究  

Research on Optimizing Number of Experts in Reviewing"Belt and Road"International Science and Technology Cooperation Project

作　　者：贠涛 张金倩楠 李姗姗 赵新力[1,2] Yun Tao;Zhang Jinqiannan;Li Shanshan;Zhao Xinli(China Science and Technology Exchange Center,Beijing 100045,China;China Institute for Science and Technology Policy at Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)

机构地区：[1]中国科学技术交流中心,北京100045 [2]清华大学中国科技政策研究中心,北京100084

出　　处：《科技管理研究》2021年第15期52-57,共6页Science and Technology Management Research

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目“‘一带一路’倡议实施中的科技开放合作重点与难点研究”(18BGJ075)阶段成果。

摘　　要：同行评审作为科研项目评审立项过程中的核心环节,广泛地应用于中国各级科研计划的管理过程。但是,在“一带一路”国际科技合作项目的评审环节,仍然存在着评审效率较低的问题,表现为项目评审周期较长和评审费用支出较高的问题。研究以“一带一路”国际科技合作项目投票打分情况为数据来源,利用斯皮尔曼等级相关系数整体定量衡量不同专家数量组合对同行评审的影响,并定量给出影响的特征值。据此进一步提出优化“一带一路”国际科技合作项目专家评审效率的建议。Peer review,as the core mean in the process of scientific research project review and approval,is widely used in the management process at all levels in China.However,in the process of project review of"Belt and Road"International Science and Technology Cooperation Project,there are still problems of low efficiency,such as long project review cycle and high cost.This paper studies the disputes employing Spearman correlation on voting score of"Belt and Road"International Science and Technology Cooperation Project,giving the characteristic value of the influence of certain number of review experts.The numerical results show that the number of evaluation experts still has the potential to be further optimized.

关 键 词：同行评审 一带一路 斯皮尔曼等级相关系数 科研管理 国际合作 科学技术 

分 类 号：G301[文化科学]