基于舆情史料分析的南海海洋划界问题  

South China Sea Maritime Delimitation Based on Analysis of Historical Data of Public Opinion

作　　者：陈书鹏 吴绍渊 张峰[1] CHEN Shupeng;WU Shaoyuan;ZHANG Feng(nstitute of South China Sea Cloud System and Marine Economy&Politics,Shanghai Maritime University,Shanghai 201306,China;Department of History,Sun Yat-Sen University,Guangzhou 510275,China)

机构地区：[1]上海海事大学南海云系统与海洋经济政治研究所,上海201306 [2]中山大学历史系,广州510275

出　　处：《海南热带海洋学院学报》2021年第4期29-35,43,共8页Journal of Hainan Tropical Ocean University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(17BGJ046);国家社会科学基金重大专项(20VHQ004)。

摘　　要：基于《联合国海洋法公约》与舆情记录的史证性、互证性等特点,择南海划界问题为典型案例展开分析,各方作为事实依据的新闻、历史、学术、政治等多维度相互支撑的史料证据可在国际、国内舆情史料中得到互证。相关史证证据链集中体现于以《联合国海洋法公约》、国际条约公告、南海文明、更路簿、口述历史、航海技术、官员巡视、地图等为代表的关键证据点。未来,应积极拓展思路、“由点及面”构建海洋历史性权利史证体系,有针对性地深入挖掘相关的舆情史料,以积极应对当前及日后新一轮的海洋纷争。Based on United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea(UNCLOS hereinafter)and the characteristics of historical and mutual evidence of public opinion data,it finds in the case of South China Sea maritime delimitation,the multi-dimensional and mutually supported historical evidences of news,history,academia and politics as the basis of facts can be mutually verified in the historical data of international and domestic public opinion.The relevant historical evidence chain is mainly reflected in the key evidence points represented by the UNCLOS,international treaty announcements,civilization in the South China Sea,Genglubu,oral history,navigation technology,official patrol,maps,etc.In the future,we should actively expand our ideas,build a historical evidence system of marine historical rights“from point to the whole”,and dig into relevant public opinion historical materials in a targeted way,so as to actively deal with a new round of marine disputes at present and in the future.

关 键 词：海洋划界 舆情史料 历史性所有权 南海 

分 类 号：D990[政治法律—国际法学]