法官量刑的限制:通过量刑偏差说理的方式——基于62450份危险驾驶罪裁判文书的分析  

The Restriction of Judge s Sentencing:The Way of Reasoning Through Sentencing Deviation——Analysis of 62450 Judicial Documents on Dangerous Driving Crime

作　　者：曹旺 Cao Wang(Law of School,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan 411100,China)

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学法学院,湖南湘潭411100

出　　处：《中南财经政法大学研究生论丛》2021年第4期127-136,共10页Journal of the Postgraduates of Zhongnan University of Economics and Law

基　　金：2019年最高人民检察院理论研究一般课题:检察机关调查核实权研究(项目编号:GJ2019C02),部分研究成果。

摘　　要：法官量刑自由裁量权的控制上应当考虑到各层级法院面对的不同情况、不同任务,并不能对各级法院都以同一标准要求。基于危险驾驶罪的实证分析认为,应当对不同层级的法院作区别对待,将量刑充足说理、审慎详细的推论过程交由层级较高的法院,而对于基层法院法官的量刑自由裁量权则采取地方制作基准刑生成要素意见、强化或者弱化可操作性、泛化性较强情节的认定程序以及针对法官在轻罪中量刑情节认定加强审查等控制方式。其中最具有可行性的方法是“强化或者弱化可操作性、泛化性较强情节的认定程序”,其实现制度即类案检索加量刑辅助系统需要切分为类案推送与量刑建议两个模块,并由法官对适用与偏离建议进行量刑偏差说理。The control of the judge s discretion in sentencing should take into account the different situations and tasks faced by the courts at all levels,and the courts at all levels should not be required by the same standard.Based on an empirical analysis of the crime of dangerous driving that should make differently on different levels of courts,will be sufficient sentencing reasoning,prudent detailed reasoning process to a higher level of the court,and for the grass-roots court sentencing discretion take place benchmark punishment generated elements views,strengthening or weakening operability,generalization and strong plot confirmation process for the judge in the misdemeanor sentencing control methods such as the heightened scrutiny of the plot.Among them,the most feasible method is to“strengthen or weaken the identification procedure of operable and generalized circumstances”.Its implementation system,namely,class case retrieval and sentencing auxiliary system,needs to be divided into two modules:class case push and sentencing suggestion,and the judge will rationalize the application and deviation of the suggestion.

关 键 词：量刑裁量权 量刑说理 随机森林算法 量刑情节 量刑辅助系统 

分 类 号：D92[政治法律—法学]