宫颈环切术治疗重度宫颈糜烂的临床效果研究  

Research of the Clinical Effect of Cervical Circumcision for Severe Cervical Erosion

作　　者：高文娟 Gao Wenjuan(Qingyang Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Qingyang 745000, China)

机构地区：[1]庆阳市中医院,甘肃庆阳745000

出　　处：《黑龙江科学》2021年第16期78-79,共2页Heilongjiang Science

摘　　要：观察宫颈环切术治疗重度宫颈糜烂的临床效果。选取50例重度宫颈糜烂患者为研究对象,按照是否行宫颈环切术将患者分为对照组与实验组,每组各25例。对照组未行宫颈环切术而采用宫颈锥形切除术,实验组采用宫颈环切术,比较两组的治疗效果。实验组术中平均出血量、平均手术时间以及阴道排液时间等手术指标均显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。实验组术后48 h皮质醇、肾上腺素、C反应蛋白以及白介素-6等应激性指标均显著优于对照组(P<0.05)。实验组治疗总有效率(96.00%)显著高于对照组(P<0.05)。结果表明,宫颈环切术治疗重度宫颈糜烂的临床效果显著优于宫颈锥形切除术者。The research observes the clinical effect of cervical circumcision for severe cervical erosion.50 patients with severe cervical erosion are selected as the research objects,and they are divided into control group and experimental group according to whether receiving cervical circumcision or not,with 25 cases in each group.Control group don’t receive cervical circumcision,but receive conical cervicectomy,while experimental group receive cervical erosion.The treatment effects of two groups are compared.The operation indexes,such as the average bleeding amount,average operation time and vaginal drainage time,of the experimental group are significantly better than control group(P<0.05).The irritability indexes,such as postoperative 48 h cortisol,epinephrine,C-reation protein and interleukin-6,in the experimental group are significantly better than control group(P<0.05).The total effective rate of experiment group(96.00%)is significantly higher than control group(P<0.05).The results indicate that the clinical effect of cervical circumcision for severe cervical erosion is significantly better than patients with conical cervicectomy.

关 键 词：宫颈环切术 重度宫颈糜烂 临床效果 

分 类 号：R711.3[医药卫生—妇产科学]