检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:宋河发 方紫阳 武晶晶 Song Hefa;Fang Ziyang;Wu Jingjing(Institutes of Science and Development,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100190,China;School of Public Policy and Management,School of Intellectual Property,University of Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China;China Automotive Intellectual Property Investment Operation Center,Beijing 100160,China)
机构地区:[1]中国科学院科技战略咨询研究院,北京100190 [2]中国科学院大学公共政策与管理学院、知识产权学院,北京100049 [3]中国汽车产业知识产权投资运营中心,北京100160
出 处:《科研管理》2021年第8期26-34,共9页Science Research Management
基 金:国家重点研发计划(2017YFB1401900)。
摘 要:本文梳理了标准必要专利许可费计算司法实践和学术研究成果,提出了标准必要专利许可费率综合计算方法。通过企业财务成本费用利润归类计算专利技术成本费用利润贡献占比,通过计算产品全部标准必要专利数占全部专利数比例计算标准必要专利数与全部专利数量占比,通过技术功效矩阵专利价值分析计算专利权人标准必要专利分值与全部必要专利分值占比。通过将三个占比相乘得出标准必要专利的许可费率,为企业专利许可、司法审判提供了一个新的方法。我国应建立企业技术贡献会计核算制度,完善技术要素贡献企业会计核算方法,建立标准必要专利认定标准和第三方认定制度,制定技术功效矩阵标准必要专利价值计算基本规范和流程。This paper reviews the judicial practices and academic research articles of the Essential Standard Patent(ESP) license fee rate calculation methods, and puts forward a Comprehensive Calculation Method which is based on the Cost-Expense-profit Analysis Method, the ESP Contribution Rate Analysis method, and the ESP Technical Efficiency Matrix Value Analysis Method. From classifying the costs and expenses of technology, investment, management and labor, using the Cost-Expense-profit Analysis Method to calculate the proportion of technical elements in the four elements, the real technology and the patented technology contribution proportion to the product profit can be got. After getting the real patented technology contribution proportion to the product profit, it is needed to get ESP′s contribution to the patented technology by calculating the proportion of the total ESP number to the total patent number. The Patent Pool Comparison Method considers that joining the patent pool has the privilege of free exploitation of other patents in the patent pool. However, each ESP position and function in the polled ESPs is different, so the license fee rate should be calculated by evaluating the value of each patentee and all patentees′ ESP′s value scores. From using the Technical Efficiency Matrix Value Analysis Method to calculate the ESPs′ value score to the patent pool′s ESP value scores, the contribution proportion of each patentee′s ESP′s value scores to total ESP′s value scores can be got. In the end, by multiplying the above three proportions, the ESP license fee rate each patentee should pay or collect in the pooled ESPs can be got. This comprehensive calculation method of the three methods is time-sequential, which not only solves the problems and shortcomings of the single method, but also scientifically and accurately solves the calculation problem of ESP license fee rate, and provides a new method for the patent license negotiation and the judicial trial in ESP license fee rate calculation. This m
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38