论个人信息处理者的算法说明义务  

On the Algorithm Explanation Obligation of Personal Information Processors

作　　者：吕炳斌[1] LV Bing-bin(Law School,Nanjing University,Nanjing 210093)

机构地区：[1]南京大学法学院,南京210093

出　　处：《现代法学》2021年第4期89-101,共13页Modern Law Science

摘　　要：告知同意系个人信息保护的基本要求和核心规范。告知中的“明示”要求和充分性要求均蕴含着说明义务。在应用算法的自动化决策场合,个人信息处理者也应承担相应的“算法说明义务”。算法说明义务在理论上具有正当性,不仅共享着个人信息处理者的说明义务的正当理论,还具有若干额外的补强理由,但同时也面临一些抵触性的理由;这些理由相互作用,决定了算法说明义务的限度。算法说明义务的目的在于保障个人知情,该义务指向关于算法技术及其应用方面的有用信息,但无需涵盖算法的技术细节和复杂的数学解释。为弥补算法说明义务的不足,可辅之以算法问责制,对算法进行协同治理。The informed consent is the basic requirement and a core norm for the protection of personal information.Both the“explicit”requirement and the sufficiency requirement in the notification rule imply the obligation of explanation.In the case of automated decision-making using algorithms,personal information processors should also undertake a corresponding“algorithm explanation obligation”.The algorithm explanation obligation is theoretically justified.In addition to sharing the justifications of the explanation obligation of the personal information processor,it has a number of additional reasons for reinforcement,but it also faces some conflicting reasons,which interact and determine the limit of the algorithm explanation obligation.The purpose of the algorithm explanation obligation is to safeguard personal awareness.What needs to be explained is useful information about the algorithm technology and its application,but there is no need to provide the technical details and complex mathematical explanations of the algorithm.In order to make up for the insufficiency of the algorithm’s explanation,it can be supplemented by the algorithmic accountability system thus to coordinately regulate the algorithm.

关 键 词：个人信息处理 算法决策 告知同意 说明义务 算法说明义务 

分 类 号：DF52[政治法律—民商法学]