检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:庄晓华[1] 张建文 ZHUANG Xiao-hua;ZHANG Jian-wen(Administrative Law School, Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing 401120, China)
出 处:《西南政法大学学报》2021年第4期24-33,共10页Journal of Southwest University of Political Science and Law
基 金:2021年西南民族法文化研究中心项目“中国传统司法文化对当代中国司法的影响”(21SKJD026)。
摘 要:根据《民法典》第10条的规定,习惯可以作为国家制定法的有效补充。从我国的司法实践来看,法官主动选择运用民事习惯解决社会纠纷的案件越来越多,与此同时,民事习惯在我国司法实践中也存在着被随意运用,甚至被滥用的现象。本文通过对我国司法实践中民事习惯运用的现状考察,找出现实运用中存在的困境,分析困境产生的原因,并在此基础上提出相应的解决措施,以期对司法实务有所裨益。According to Article 10 of the Civil Code,custom can serve as an effective supplement to the law enacted by the state.From the perspective of China’s judicial practice,judges are increasingly choosing to use civil customs to resolve social disputes,but at the same time,there is also the phenomenon of civil customs being used arbitrarily or even abused in China’s judicial application.This article examines the current situation of the use of civil customs in China’s judicial practice,identifies the dilemmas that exist in their use in reality,analyses the reasons for the dilemmas,and proposes corresponding measures,with a view to benefiting judicial practice.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.171